Welcome to the Graham Slee Audio Products Owners Forum ![]() Open to all owners plus those contemplating the purchase of a Graham Slee HiFi System Components audio product and wishing to use this forum's loaner program: join here (Rules on posting can be found here) This website along with trade marks Graham Slee and HiFi System Components are owned by Cadman Enterprises Ltd |
soon to order Solo |
Post Reply
|
Page <12345> |
| Author | |
EDMCR
New Member
Joined: 13 Sep 2010 Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Sep 2010 at 1:37am |
|
ok, one last question ive read in the above post the volume is at 9 O'clock position will this make a difference where the vol is at?
|
|
![]() |
|
Fatmangolf
Moderator Group
Joined: 23 Dec 2009 Location: Middlesbrough Status: Offline Points: 9695 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Sep 2010 at 6:17pm |
|
Hi EDMCR, good question! The level probably isn't critical but I wanted some signal to be amplified by the Novo and current going into the earplugs. It was a compromise between no signal and having an irritating tinny noise from the little earphones if the level was at 12 o'clock. Sorry, my description made the volume setting sound more precise than it was!
Most of the burn-in was like everyone's approach, simply leaving the Novo powered up and letting the components develop. The changes to the sound quality over the following weeks are quite dramatic.
|
|
|
Jon
Open mind and ears whilst owning GSP Genera, Accession M, Accession MC, Elevator EXP, Solo ULDE, Proprius amps, Cusat50 cables, Lautus digital cable, Spatia cables and links, and a Majestic DAC. |
|
![]() |
|
pompeyexile
New Member
Joined: 13 Apr 2009 Location: Barlby, N Yorks Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Jul 2011 at 7:37pm |
|
I'm considering buying a DAC too. Originaly it was to route my Onkyo ND-S1 i-pod dock through to improve the sound of that, so I was looking at spending about £160 on a MF V-DAC. Then I thought if I spend a bit more I could go for the Cambridge Dacmagic and route both the dock and my Solo through it. But i'm now wondering do I really need the Dacmagic and is my money better spent (because the price isn't much different) upgrading my Solo to the Ultra Linear instead and waiting a bit and go for the V-DAC later for the i-pod dock alone?
At present my Solo is connected direct to my Musical Fidelity A5 Integrated amp via the tape out and I must admit I enjoy the sound i'm getting from my Sennheiser HD250II Linears so the real question is......which do you think will improve the sound most, the DAC or the Solo upgrade?
|
|
![]() |
|
mrarroyo
Moderator Group
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Location: Miami Beach, FL Status: Offline Points: 1401 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 Jul 2011 at 12:50pm |
|
Hi pompeyexile! I must assume you want the Onkyo ND-S1 to use it with an iPod/iPhone/etc. The Onkyo unit will extract the digital information from the various Apple units and allow you to send the digital information to an external DAC (V-DAC, Dacmagic, etc) to convert the files to analog which in turn you would feed the amp(s) of your choice.
As an option you could go with a Pure i-20 Dock ( http://www.pure.com/products/product.asp?Product=VL-61429&Category= ). The i-20 has an internal DAC, based on what I have read it is not as good as the Dacmagic's but it will allow you to experiment at a much lower price point and then if you decide to pursue it then you could add the Dacmagic or whatever. If you keep your music in your PC/MAC which you probably do since you have an iPod or similar then you may wish to avoid the entire i-Dock and use an Squeezebox Duet or Touch to stream music from you PC/MAC. The internal DAC on the Touch or Duet can do 24/96 and it is quite good, of course later you could buy a high end DAC if you so choose. The advantage of the Duet or Touch is that it opens up a lot of Radio Station Streaming music via the internet. The Squeeze Box products do not require your PC/MAC to be on when streaming music from the internet radio stations. I have both systems and use the dock/dac arrangement in my office at work and the Squeezebox at home. Hope this additional options help. |
|
|
Miguel
|
|
![]() |
|
pompeyexile
New Member
Joined: 13 Apr 2009 Location: Barlby, N Yorks Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 Jul 2011 at 12:36am |
|
Miguel,
I already have the Onkyo (had it just over a year) as my partner likes her i-pod, especially the ability to randomly pick tracks from the hundreds she has on it (instead of changing cd's) which she likes to use when we have people round for a boogy. So I thought for the times we had to listen to that through the hi-fi i'd try and get the best dock I could afford at the time, and knowing that as you so rightly say it extracts the digital indormation direct from the i-pod plus it had good reviews, I went for the Onkyo. However, I also know from what i've read that adding a DAC would inprove the sound considerably.
My thought process though as I said, was that as I was considering buying a DAC, to maybe spend a little extra on one that I could run both the i-pod and the Solo through, killing two birds with one stone so to speak, improving the sound of both. But my question was, would I be better served spending the money I would lavish on the more expensive DAC, on upgrading my Solo to the ultra linear instead? Which would make my listening experience better, running the Solo through a DAC or simply upgrading it to the ultra linear?
I guess selfishly the improvement in the i-pod sound (as I very rarely listen to it through the hi-fi it's mainly for my partner's benefit) can wait, if the Solo upgrade would benefit me more.
I suppose the obvious answer is upgrade the Solo and add a DAC later. That is if course if adding a DAC at all will improve the sound.
To DAC or not to DAC, that is the question.
|
|
![]() |
|
tg [RIP]
Moderator Group
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 Location: Sydney Status: Offline Points: 1866 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 Jul 2011 at 5:46am |
|
I would agree with that choice - I do think that will offer the best "sound for the pound". Although you mention that your Solo is connected to the tape out of your amp I see no mention of your source - one assumes a CD player? and that the connection to the tape out is a convenience that allows use of source with either the Solo or a speaker system. FWIW - I have messed around with a number of DACs and read many reports on many different DACs as well as listening to many on friends differing systems - many of these use their DACs to interface computer based systems, my feeling is that it requires a fair investment in a DAC to significantly outclass a competent CD player. In that respect, if the objective is to improve on the ipod dock or access computer sources, then the Dacmagic might prove quite acceptable (the Audio GD products receive very good press out here and a number are price competitive with the DM), if however, the objective in the longer term is to improve on a decent CDP, then the bar might need raising somewhat - the new Rega DAC is receiving rather good press. I do not own a DAC or CDP that betters my analogue setup, but the investment is not as great either. My preferred DAC is a DIY job with many mods and is now sounding quite good, the total investment in that is now a deal more than the cost of a DM and a number of parts used are now virtually unobtainable so it would be difficult to recommend it. For a memory refresh, I have just now done a quick comparison between the analogue out of a modded Marantz CD 52 SE and a modded Beresford Caiman (the mods would take its cost to around the DM and have received significant following elsewhere), I also compared it to the analogue out of a semi-pro soundcard that uses the Envy 24 chip and AKM hard codecs. While I might have felt that a slight edge went to the Caiman v the soundcard, (depending on the digital cable used and the output board selected - I tried the "Gator" discrete board and the modified stock board with changed caps and THS 4032 opamps) the difference v the CDP were largely of slightly differing "flavour". Testing was done using both inputs on the Solo to allow quick switching and I reran 2 different tracks, one classical, one pop. The only significant advantage of the DAC was multiple inputs and the possibility of using the variable output as a preamp or for level matching. There was no appreciable benefit in SQ over the standalone player. Reverting to my preferred DAC, there was an obvious step up in SQ, though it OTOH, does not offer the same flexibility WRT inputs and volume control. Hope some of this is helpful. Edited by tg - 17 Jul 2011 at 5:50am |
|
![]() |
|
mrarroyo
Moderator Group
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Location: Miami Beach, FL Status: Offline Points: 1401 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 Jul 2011 at 1:36pm |
|
Hi Bill, I have always believed the sound starts at the source and ends on the speakers/headphones. I have a Solo SRGII and had the SRGi and the Green Solo, the SRGII is the best sounding of them. Sadly I have not listened to the Ultra Linear so I cannot comment. Having said all that I also believe that happiness at home is even more important so you must make sure that "she who must be obeyed" is VERY HAPPY!
Before I say anything else, are the files in the iPod lossless? or at least higher bit rate (256 AAC)? If neither I am not sure a better DAC would help. However if her files are Apple Lossless then a better DAC than the one in the iPod will make a difference based on the various DAC's I have used with the Wadia and the stock iPod. |
|
|
Miguel
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12345> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |