New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - When is RIAA not RIAA?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Welcome to the Graham Slee Audio Products Owners Forum

 

Open to all owners plus those contemplating the purchase of a Graham Slee HiFi System Components audio product and wishing to use this forum's loaner program: join here (Rules on posting can be found here)

This website along with trade marks Graham Slee and HiFi System Components are owned by Cadman Enterprises Ltd


When is RIAA not RIAA?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
morris_minor View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2012
Location: Surrey
Status: Offline
Points: 6197
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote morris_minor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: When is RIAA not RIAA?
    Posted: 09 Oct 2014 at 11:32am
This post on Analog Planet caught my eye.

I sought out the review it referred to.

Another reason not to believe audio equipment reviews?

TBH, I'd save myself over £12,000 and get a Revelation. Wink
Bob

Majestic DAC/pre-amp
Accession MC/Enigma, Accession MM, Reflex M, Elevator EXP, Era Gold V
Solo ULDE, Novo, Lautus USB and digital, Libran balanced, CuSat50
2 x Proprius + Spatia/Spatia Links
Back to Top
Graham Slee View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Retired

Joined: 11 Jan 2008
Location: South Yorkshire
Status: Offline
Points: 16314
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Graham Slee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Oct 2014 at 12:13pm
I see that "Tubular Tom" - in the comments section - has fallen for the BS surrounding RIAA...

For years I believed the same, but a nagging-doubt kept entering my mind. It eventually led to the "phono stage invention". So I reckoned, if I'm wrong I'll soon know, because when I listen to it, and when I measure it, the EQ will be all wrong...

Nothing of the sort! Quite a few people have listened to it at three UK shows - and liked it - plus the EQ is as accurate as component accuracy allows.

Records were produced for the masses - not just for magnetic cartridge owners. All the different EQs suited the reproduction equipment favoured (and often made) by the record labels... HMV records - HMV record players - HMV reproduction curves, for one.

RIAA Records are cut with (negative) constant velocity up to 50Hz (to provide bass boost to compensate the poor bass output of crystal cartridges); constant amplitude to 500Hz; constant velocity again to 2122Hz (to counter the resonance of crystal cartridges); and from there at constant amplitude to wherever the cutter head output falls.

Let's abbreviate that sequence to VAVA.

Enter the magnetic cartridge - its constant velocity output changes VAVA to AVAV.

The magnetic cartridge phono preamp equalises the record "upside down" - it does A where it's a V, and V where it's an A.

OK, you get the desired outcome as far as measurement is concerned, but it is not the inverse used in disc cutting.

The ear is most sensitive at mid frequencies (300Hz to 3kHz) so the last two A's and V's are the important ones. Should VA sound right when EQ'd AV, or would it be best done VA?

The only way to do that is by removing the magnetic cartridge response - to EQ that first and make its constant velocity output into one of constant amplitude.

Only then can the record be EQ'd "right way up".

Then all of a sudden, the mid-range edginess so often heard with "bad recordings" doesn't seem so bad anymore...

Seek and ye shall find... Wink

That none should be able to park up and enjoy the view without a smartphone and the knowledge in how to use apps
Back to Top
Bi-wire View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2011
Location: Shropshire, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 330
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bi-wire Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Oct 2014 at 12:44pm
Interesting and quite heated stuff, if one reads all the comments too. I use a Revelation M and most of the time the settings are left at RIAA. I'm sure that most of my record collection conforms to RIAA but it is intreresting sometimes to play around with the settings, particularly if the recording in question sounds a little thin or flat in RIAA. Occasionally, an improvement, at least to my ears, can be heard  -  and I would stress that it is my perception of the sound, not a definitive answer. These are, I assume, RIAA recordings but they can be tweaked if one wishes.
 
I also have a small number of 1950s recordings where the Revelation really comes into its own. Particularly some RCA and Decca FFRR records which, I understand, use their own curves. Here, using the recommended settings certainly pays dividends.
 
I don't pretend to understand the technicalities and reading articles on this subject has shown me that there is agreat deal to it. Moreover, I suspect that there is a grey area (period) covering the late-50s (early-60s?) as RIAA was gradually adopted but other curves were also being used. Consequently, these days I tend to go with my ears.
Peter

Satisfied user of: Revelation M, PSU1-Enigma, Solo SRGII and lots of CuSat50
Back to Top
suede View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 May 2011
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 1202
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote suede Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Oct 2014 at 12:54pm
Originally posted by Graham Slee Graham Slee wrote:

Then all of a sudden, the mid-range edginess so often heard with "bad recordings" doesn't seem so bad anymore...

Seek and ye shall find... Wink


Is that to say they (the harsh sounding records) sound a lot better than they did before? Or do they even outperform the previously favoured non-edgy sounding cuts?
Very interesting either way.


Edited by suede - 09 Oct 2014 at 12:57pm
Proprius, Reflex M, Solo UL, Bitzie, CuSats & Spatia
---------------------------------
Johan
Back to Top
Graham Slee View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Retired

Joined: 11 Jan 2008
Location: South Yorkshire
Status: Offline
Points: 16314
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Graham Slee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Oct 2014 at 1:29pm
Originally posted by suede suede wrote:

Originally posted by Graham Slee Graham Slee wrote:

Then all of a sudden, the mid-range edginess so often heard with "bad recordings" doesn't seem so bad anymore...

Seek and ye shall find... Wink


Is that to say they (the harsh sounding records) sound a lot better than they did before? Or do they even outperform the previously favoured non-edgy sounding cuts?
Very interesting either way.


Do you remember me going on about my Yes: Close To The Edge album? I can now play it and enjoy it.

IMO, it is a better sound to my ears on all my records.
That none should be able to park up and enjoy the view without a smartphone and the knowledge in how to use apps
Back to Top
morris_minor View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2012
Location: Surrey
Status: Offline
Points: 6197
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote morris_minor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Oct 2014 at 2:37pm
The notion that switchable EQ is
Quote
 ...essential to make just about anything from DGG even remotely listenable
is quite obviously nonsense, and must raise questions about the reviewer's ability to sensibly evaluate any piece of audio equipment.

Bob

Majestic DAC/pre-amp
Accession MC/Enigma, Accession MM, Reflex M, Elevator EXP, Era Gold V
Solo ULDE, Novo, Lautus USB and digital, Libran balanced, CuSat50
2 x Proprius + Spatia/Spatia Links
Back to Top
suede View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 May 2011
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 1202
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote suede Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Oct 2014 at 3:13pm
Originally posted by Graham Slee Graham Slee wrote:

Originally posted by suede suede wrote:

Originally posted by Graham Slee Graham Slee wrote:

Then all of a sudden, the mid-range edginess so often heard with "bad recordings" doesn't seem so bad anymore...

Seek and ye shall find... Wink


Is that to say they (the harsh sounding records) sound a lot better than they did before? Or do they even outperform the previously favoured non-edgy sounding cuts?
Very interesting either way.


Do you remember me going on about my Yes: Close To The Edge album? I can now play it and enjoy it.

IMO, it is a better sound to my ears on all my records.

That sounds mightily intriguing!
And I do remember a suggestion how one might enjoy CTTE the better, even with the now established shortcomings of the standard RIAA Wink


Edited by suede - 09 Oct 2014 at 3:23pm
Proprius, Reflex M, Solo UL, Bitzie, CuSats & Spatia
---------------------------------
Johan
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.