Copyright © 1998
Cadman Enterprises Ltd
Welcome to the Graham Slee Audio Products Owners Forum ![]() Open to all owners plus those contemplating the purchase of a Graham Slee HiFi System Components audio product and wishing to use this forum's loaner program: join here (Rules on posting can be found here) This website along with trade marks Graham Slee and HiFi System Components are owned by Cadman Enterprises Ltd |
headphone equalize debate - |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
TALON1973
New Member
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Status: Offline Points: 16 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: headphone equalize debate -Posted: 19 Oct 2011 at 6:09pm |
|
i use another forum for pc use , and a topic came up in regards headphones ..... was originally about what type of headphone to get ......then someone came in with headphone equalizing...... which ive never coem across and think is complete rubbish ........but its turning into a laugh ...
woudl love Graham or any of the mods to pop over and lend some wieght into this as i'm quite interested in what the answer is myself :)
Edited by TALON1973 - 19 Oct 2011 at 6:11pm |
|
![]() |
|
ellisdj
Senior Member
Joined: 08 Sep 2011 Status: Offline Points: 124 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Oct 2011 at 9:02am |
|
Hi
It was me who posted on the other forum about eq headphones - my cousin brought it to my attention about 2 weeks ago - until then I was loving the sound of my pc to heapdones HD558 via the Novo. I was very reluctant at this stage to change anything - stubborness and ignorance on my part I read this article http://www.head-fi.org/t/413900/how-to-equalize-your-headphones-a-tutorial Listened to my cousin talk about his positive personal results and explanations as to what and why. I then went and had a listen to his - came home listened to mine and immediately I could hear where it was wrong Next was to give it a try - I found it easy to find the main resonant frequency 7501 - but it took more tim to realise I have 3 resonant frequencies 5000, 7501 and 11500 An hour or so later I was semi happy- a few days later of tweaking and I am quite happy now. The tweaking has had me reducing the resonant frequencies more and more The reason it took so long for me to be happy is that all the time my mind was telling me by reducing the frequency more and more I am losing more and more detail. Once I realised that was not the case - I actually realised by doing it I was actually bringing out more detail in the mid range, opening the soundstage up and the highs sounded more realistic. Looking over other forums and posts everyone who tries it properly seem convinced and the tutorial really helps with the process. I added into another forum post to try and help people find this out - to me get your 595's sounding their best before you spend £260 on a new set of cans HD650s. You might find they will have the sound you are looking for without spending a penny - you will also see that I have strongly recommended a Slee amp as an upgrade as I also believe as an owner that it will make a big improvement as well However there seem to be people not willing to try - obviously the guy who brought the debate to this forum who thinks its "rubbish". How can a headphone manufacturer make something to perfectly suit everyones ears - they cant - therefore tweaking is surely required based on that thought alone! The guy in the tutorial makes references to Siegfried Linkwitz and his process of discovery then elimination makes a lot of sense. You adjust the sound of your headphones on your ears to get as flat a freq curve as possible . |
|
![]() |
|
mrarroyo
Moderator Group
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Location: Miami Beach, FL Status: Offline Points: 1401 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Oct 2011 at 11:27am |
|
Equalization in general is a heavily debated subject, whether you are using speakers or headphones. I normally find speakers/amp/etc. that meet my sound preferences without the need of using equalization. In my youth I used parametric equalizers to make up for the room deficiencies and also room treatment to deal with excessive reflections. It worked to some degree but it was a very expensive exercise.
As far as headphones I do not use it since the equalization built into many digital players creates distortion. Some of the newer add ons to iTunes do a much better job.
|
|
|
Miguel
|
|
![]() |
|
ellisdj
Senior Member
Joined: 08 Sep 2011 Status: Offline Points: 124 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Oct 2011 at 11:57am |
|
Hi Mrarraoyo
To test that theory I have tried listening to the same song through media player and then foobar ( with eq installed but flat) and they sounded similar - better fro foobar Therefore the eq used Electri-Q is not adding any distortion thats audible to me. Edited by ellisdj - 20 Oct 2011 at 11:59am |
|
![]() |
|
tg [RIP]
Moderator Group
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 Location: Sydney Status: Offline Points: 1866 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Oct 2011 at 2:24pm |
|
Must say this is the first I have heard of headphone eq.
Rather than going on hearsay, I went to the source of the reference to Linkwitz, http://www.linkwitzlab.com/reference_earphones.htm to see what this respected speaker designer had to say on the subject. I suggest you do so also as a first step. That alteration of the output of your headphone amplifier by an output filter network as he has done or by DSP prior to amplification will alter the sound of your headphones is without question. Whether that alteration will be an improvement is a question for the individual to answer for themself. It is worth noting on the Linkwitz page his final paragraphs WRT the Shure E2C - that he did find 3 broad peaks but did not consider that they needed eq. This suggests to me that the desirability of eq will vary from headphone to headphone (and perhaps by amplifier dependent on their own colourations if any) and listener to listener. I would suggest that this topic be taken as information to be received and tried for oneself, I am not sufficiently technically knowledgeable to provide any particular reasons why this might or might not be a worthwhile exercise. I have found my preferred headphones to have a very similar balance to my speakers and am disinclined to tamper with that, particularly using DSP, however, should the time offer I may do so, if only to be better informed on the subject. I would be very interested in Graham's take on this. BTW the conclusion that eq is not adding distortion, if judged by listening when set flat, does not appear to be a valid conclusion. Perhaps you have not elucidated your testing fully or I have misunderstood. |
|
![]() |
|
ellisdj
Senior Member
Joined: 08 Sep 2011 Status: Offline Points: 124 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Oct 2011 at 2:46pm |
|
Hi TG
Thanks for the reponse This is about making your current kit sound better - not changing any sonic characters that you have grown to love. people will spend £0000s trying to improve sound - sometimes it the free things we can do that make all the difference. Simple test and stage 1 - run a signal sweep a few times at a decent volume and see if you hear clear peaks in volume as the sound goes up the frequency range - I am betting you will. If that is the case consider you are hearing these frequencies potenitally 9db above the others around it - that is not how the headphone manufacturer intended yo to hear it. You can use the software Sinegen to do this manually - its the best way as you can move up the range slowly to hear and record the start middle and finish of the peak. Youy can also set macros of any frequncy at any db level. Therefore when you find the middle of the peaking frequency you can set macros at -1 db - 2 db ... - 9db etc at that frequency you can then quickly go from a reference frequency (one you know is not peaking and at 0db) back and forth to the different db levels to hear which sounds the closest in terms of volume. You then now roughly how much that freq is peaking and how much it will need reducing in the eq - make sense, not explained greatly? There are a lot of forums with info on this - I am certainly not the only one suggesting it improves sound. Its made a big impact on me to the point where I am bothering to write all this - I expected everyone to already be doing it and thought they would be telling me new stuff related to it Trying to get onto the Linklwitz page to read his comments but I think we all must be crashing it atm This is where the reference is made I am a strong proponent of properly applied equalization. When used correctly, equalization can make a good headphone great, and a great headphone superb. And most headphones need at least some equalization. In my 3 years since joining Head-Fi, having heard and used many different types of headphones, I have noticed a phenomenon that has occurred with every headphone, ear bud, and IEM I have ever used. I first read about it at Siegfried Linkwitz's page some years ago, where he discusses his method for equalizing the Etymotic ER4S. He states that "an acoustic impedance mismatch between transducer, ear canal, and eardrum" is causing a resonance that results in a large peak at 7.5kHz, coloring the sound. He and a friend of his also experienced the same effect when using a pair of old Sennheiser HD414s. (For the record, I'd wager good money this is the primary reason why so many people cannot tolerate the ER4S.) I too have noticed this, with my HD650s, ER4Ss, and even my STAX headphones. Anyone is susceptible to this effect, and unless your headphone's inherent frequency response happens to match your personal resonance frequency, you are likely already experiencing the effect. Even very high-end headphones will exhibit this problem. On this comment "BTW the conclusion that eq is not adding distortion, if judged by listening when set flat, does not appear to be a valid conclusion. Perhaps you have not elucidated your testing fully or I have misunderstood" I have just twigged - using the included eq adds distortion is what was meant by the comment - maybe that is the case - bear in mnd here we are reducing freq not adding anything. The tutorial is stating the need to add in a good equlaizer - one that allows you to set the exact freq, exact db change and the steepness that it happens by Electric Q is suggested. Edited by ellisdj - 20 Oct 2011 at 3:28pm |
|
![]() |
|
Fatmangolf
Moderator Group
Joined: 23 Dec 2009 Location: Middlesbrough Status: Offline Points: 9695 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Oct 2011 at 8:28pm |
|
The link is http://www.linkwitzlab.com/reference_earphones.htm - it is well worth a read as Tony wrote.
I'm with Miguel, start from a sound you like! And try different types of headphones (or speakers) and to find the best sounding one for you at the price. By all means fine tune with carefully judged EQ to get your best take on your chosen model. But you can't make a Tele into a Les Paul ...and why would you? Measuring the physical behaviour of the transducer, inverting it and applying the correction digitally will be a compromise, possibly a very good one.
Put the speakers in a room or wrap the phones round your head and it gets more complicated. Just open the curtains or move the sofa or the paintings on the wall, and the room acoustic changes a bit. That's real life for you! Even headphones on your ears are different to mine because they are complex cavities attached to a membrane and a brain. We may agree on what sounds better and I hope on the pleasure of tinkering/tweaking the hi-fi gear we use.
IMO EQ has a place when I want more bass or treble for particular recording. The rest of the time it is turned off!
|
|
|
Jon
Open mind and ears whilst owning GSP Genera, Accession M, Accession MC, Elevator EXP, Solo ULDE, Proprius amps, Cusat50 cables, Lautus digital cable, Spatia cables and links, and a Majestic DAC. |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |