Copyright © 1998
Cadman Enterprises Ltd
Welcome to the Graham Slee Audio Products Owners Forum ![]() Open to all owners plus those contemplating the purchase of a Graham Slee HiFi System Components audio product and wishing to use this forum's loaner program: join here (Rules on posting can be found here) This website along with trade marks Graham Slee and HiFi System Components are owned by Cadman Enterprises Ltd |
Proprius As Headphone Amp |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 4> |
| Author | ||
Graham Slee
Admin Group
Retired Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Location: South Yorkshire Status: Offline Points: 16314 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Proprius As Headphone AmpPosted: 14 Jul 2015 at 10:18pm |
|
|
I know a few have tried the Proprius as a headphone amp but until today I had not.
The music source is always going to be whatever is being tested in the workshop, and currently it's Bluetooth, or more exactly the Huawei Ascend playing albums from a mem stick via Winamp and transmitting using SBC to the Bluetooth module I'm trying out, which is set to output SPDIF. Without any buffering the module is driving a 6 metre (20 foot) coax to a coax input on the Majestic. From there it's going to the pair of Proprius amps via the Majestic balanced outputs using the R3 single-ended cables. I am driving my HD250II's and there is a 15 Ohm resistor in series with each leg on the headphone adapter lead I made up for the test. I don't know if I am in order saying this but it's the best I've heard on headphones yet! The only downside being hiss between tracks, and that's exactly what I expected from a power amp intended for speakers. I could easily accept the little amount of hiss, but I know there are some fussy people out there. I reckon if I work out a passive attenuator circuit to reduce the full volume to something that doesn't burn your ears out instantly - which it could mine - then the hiss will go down with it. I know there are those who reckon passive attenuators decrease damping factor but most wouldn't know Kirchhoff from their elbow - source impedance can be made as low as you want. I think there is some considerable mileage in using the Proprius for headphones and this is going to be quite some fun (for me). I once did this before some years ago when developing the MA230 studio power amp, and I'd forgotten how open doing it this way sounds. That was on some of those black foam earpad Senny's. |
||
|
That none should be able to park up and enjoy the view without a smartphone and the knowledge in how to use apps
|
||
![]() |
||
Ash
Senior Member
Joined: 18 Mar 2013 Location: Dorset Status: Offline Points: 4360 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 Jul 2015 at 11:31pm |
|
|
Graham, try setting the volume pot of the Proprius pair at different positions and adjusting the Majestic pot accordingly. I never turn the Proprius pots fully clockwise (out of circuit) due to louder, more audible hiss through both my K1000 and through my Mark Audio 12PW/7P speakers. As I turn the Proprius pots down from max, the hiss becomes much less audible through both transducers.
For the Mark Audio speakers in parallel, I set each Proprius to 9 o'clock, 12 o'clock or somewhere inbetween. For a fully opened out K1000, I set the Proprius pots to somewhere before the 3 o'clock position so that I can't hear any hiss. I tend to just set both halfway, at 12 o'clock so that hiss is so low level that I cannot hear it. For HD540II from Proprius, I think I set the pots at 9-12 o'clock so I couldn't hear hiss. For the more sensitive HD800, I set them at no higher than 9 o'clock. The negative leads were connected common ground. Where I set them depends on the load impedance and sensitivity but I never set them out of circuit as my ears can easily pick up low level hiss (you probably already know that I listen carefully and attentively). For high impedance headphones such as the Sennheisers that I have tested, the Proprius with pots turned down seem equally capable as the Solo ULDE, in my honest opinion. I didn't need series resistors when the pot itself is one big variable resistor. Set the pots fully down before commencing playback then carefully nudge them up a bit, staying under 9 o'clock. At least make sure the pots lie above the slight channel imbalance position at around 7 o'clock so that you're beyond the point where the left channel is slightly louder than the right channel, to where they fully equalise. HD250II is good but K1000 would show your ears the full extent of how good the Proprius can perform.
Edited by Ash - 14 Jul 2015 at 11:48pm |
||
![]() |
||
Graham Slee
Admin Group
Retired Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Location: South Yorkshire Status: Offline Points: 16314 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Jul 2015 at 9:00am |
|
|
Ash, you're right, it's the balanced input stage input impedance that's the source of the hiss, and turning the levels down attenuates it. Obviously resistors are noise sources and add FET inputs and you'll have plenty, because that's what FETs do.
OK for speakers because the hiss is unnoticeable: except in your case with your near-fields' and highly attentive listening. The great thing about inverting inputs is they don't suffer common mode distortion, and FETs have stacks more headroom (than BJTs), which means you can throw anything at them and the music will swing (and "It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing" to me). But, as I keep trying to educate this world, electronics isn't perfect - most people mistakenly think it is - but it is man-made from the very stuff we walk upon (rocks and clay). There are trade-offs, and in this example it's hiss. As I've been saying since the very start, low-noise = boredom. Musical fun comes from timing, and timing requires fast electronics, and fast electronics has large slew-rates, and anything having a large slew-rate isn't low noise (as all the data sheets say). Anyway, that out of the way, the reason I've been trying this is because I'm having a go at designing an integrated - an all-in-one amp. Your opinion, Miguels' opinion, and those of a few others, is that the Proprius plays headphones well. So I tried it for myself and I agree. Rather than trying to shoehorn a separate headphone amp circuit into the box, it makes sense to me to use the power amp for headphone duties, provided it's good enough - which this obviously is. The age-old problem is in attenuating the output to the right sort of level - the attenuation required often making headphones sound unmusical - or that's the rumour everybody latches onto. Your explanation of your findings have given me the answer. Although the source driving the power-amp (yes, the power amp will be Proprius) might have a different level of hiss, putting the attenuation at the input instead of the output removes the need for output attenuation! The headphone jack has separate contacts which detect when the plug is plugged in, and they can be used to switch a relay which places an attenuator at the power amp input, effectively doing the same as turning the pots down on the Proprius. Solution!
|
||
|
That none should be able to park up and enjoy the view without a smartphone and the knowledge in how to use apps
|
||
![]() |
||
miT
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Jan 2009 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 890 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Jul 2015 at 11:31am |
|
|
Interesting... So I wouldn't need to get a speaker taps cable for my headphones with the new amp to get 4w/channel then Graham? Even better!
Not that output has been decided on yet of course... Edited by miT - 15 Jul 2015 at 11:31am |
||
![]() |
||
morris_minor
Moderator Group
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 Location: Surrey Status: Offline Points: 6197 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Jul 2015 at 4:40pm |
|
|
Right now I can't be the only one wondering how the Solo ULDE stacks up against the suitably attenuated Proprius . . . can I?
|
||
|
Bob
Majestic DAC/pre-amp Accession MC/Enigma, Accession MM, Reflex M, Elevator EXP, Era Gold V Solo ULDE, Novo, Lautus USB and digital, Libran balanced, CuSat50 2 x Proprius + Spatia/Spatia Links |
||
![]() |
||
miT
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Jan 2009 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 890 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Jul 2015 at 4:41pm |
|
I believe the answer is not quite as good...
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Drewan77
Senior Member
Joined: 25 May 2013 Location: Chester,England Status: Offline Points: 1544 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Jul 2015 at 5:30pm |
|
|
||
|
Older than I once was, younger than I'll be
............................. Andrew |
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 123 4> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |