New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Proprius As Headphone Amp
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Welcome to the Graham Slee Audio Products Owners Forum

 

Open to all owners plus those contemplating the purchase of a Graham Slee HiFi System Components audio product and wishing to use this forum's loaner program: join here (Rules on posting can be found here)

This website along with trade marks Graham Slee and HiFi System Components are owned by Cadman Enterprises Ltd


Proprius As Headphone Amp

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
Author
Graham Slee View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Retired

Joined: 11 Jan 2008
Location: South Yorkshire
Status: Offline
Points: 16314
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Graham Slee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Proprius As Headphone Amp
    Posted: 14 Jul 2015 at 10:18pm
I know a few have tried the Proprius as a headphone amp but until today I had not.

The music source is always going to be whatever is being tested in the workshop, and currently it's Bluetooth, or more exactly the Huawei Ascend playing albums from a mem stick via Winamp and transmitting using SBC to the Bluetooth module I'm trying out, which is set to output SPDIF. Without any buffering the module is driving a 6 metre (20 foot) coax to a coax input on the Majestic. From there it's going to the pair of Proprius amps via the Majestic balanced outputs using the R3 single-ended cables. I am driving my HD250II's and there is a 15 Ohm resistor in series with each leg on the headphone adapter lead I made up for the test.

I don't know if I am in order saying this but it's the best I've heard on headphones yet!

The only downside being hiss between tracks, and that's exactly what I expected from a power amp intended for speakers. I could easily accept the little amount of hiss, but I know there are some fussy people out there.

I reckon if I work out a passive attenuator circuit to reduce the full volume to something that doesn't burn your ears out instantly - which it could mine - then the hiss will go down with it.

I know there are those who reckon passive attenuators decrease damping factor but most wouldn't know Kirchhoff from their elbow - source impedance can be made as low as you want.

I think there is some considerable mileage in using the Proprius for headphones and this is going to be quite some fun (for me).

I once did this before some years ago when developing the MA230 studio power amp, and I'd forgotten how open doing it this way sounds. That was on some of those black foam earpad Senny's.
That none should be able to park up and enjoy the view without a smartphone and the knowledge in how to use apps
Back to Top
Ash View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2013
Location: Dorset
Status: Offline
Points: 4360
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ash Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Jul 2015 at 11:31pm
Graham, try setting the volume pot of the Proprius pair at different positions and adjusting the Majestic pot accordingly. I never turn the Proprius pots fully clockwise (out of circuit) due to louder, more audible hiss through both my K1000 and through my Mark Audio 12PW/7P speakers. As I turn the Proprius pots down from max, the hiss becomes much less audible through both transducers.

For the Mark Audio speakers in parallel, I set each Proprius to 9 o'clock, 12 o'clock or somewhere inbetween. For a fully opened out K1000, I set the Proprius pots to somewhere before the 3 o'clock position so that I can't hear any hiss. I tend to just set both halfway, at 12 o'clock so that hiss is so low level that I cannot hear it.

For HD540II from Proprius, I think I set the pots at 9-12 o'clock so I couldn't hear hiss. For the more sensitive HD800, I set them at no higher than 9 o'clock. The negative leads were connected common ground. 

Where I set them depends on the load impedance and sensitivity but I never set them out of circuit as my ears can easily pick up low level hiss (you probably already know that I listen carefully and attentively).

For high impedance headphones such as the Sennheisers that I have tested, the Proprius with pots turned down seem equally capable as the Solo ULDE, in my honest opinion. I didn't need series resistors when the pot itself is one big variable resistor. Set the pots fully down before commencing playback then carefully nudge them up a bit, staying under 9 o'clock. At least make sure the pots lie above the slight channel imbalance position at around 7 o'clock so that you're beyond the point where the left channel is slightly louder than the right channel, to where they fully equalise.


HD250II is good but K1000 would show your ears the full extent of how good the Proprius can perform.


Edited by Ash - 14 Jul 2015 at 11:48pm
Back to Top
Graham Slee View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Retired

Joined: 11 Jan 2008
Location: South Yorkshire
Status: Offline
Points: 16314
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Graham Slee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Jul 2015 at 9:00am
Ash, you're right, it's the balanced input stage input impedance that's the source of the hiss, and turning the levels down attenuates it. Obviously resistors are noise sources and add FET inputs and you'll have plenty, because that's what FETs do.

OK for speakers because the hiss is unnoticeable: except in your case with your near-fields' and highly attentive listening.

The great thing about inverting inputs is they don't suffer common mode distortion, and FETs have stacks more headroom (than BJTs), which means you can throw anything at them and the music will swing (and "It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing" to me).

But, as I keep trying to educate this world, electronics isn't perfect - most people mistakenly think it is - but it is man-made from the very stuff we walk upon (rocks and clay). There are trade-offs, and in this example it's hiss.

As I've been saying since the very start, low-noise = boredom. Musical fun comes from timing, and timing requires fast electronics, and fast electronics has large slew-rates, and anything having a large slew-rate isn't low noise (as all the data sheets say).

Anyway, that out of the way, the reason I've been trying this is because I'm having a go at designing an integrated - an all-in-one amp. Your opinion, Miguels' opinion, and those of a few others, is that the Proprius plays headphones well. So I tried it for myself and I agree.

Rather than trying to shoehorn a separate headphone amp circuit into the box, it makes sense to me to use the power amp for headphone duties, provided it's good enough - which this obviously is.

The age-old problem is in attenuating the output to the right sort of level - the attenuation required often making headphones sound unmusical - or that's the rumour everybody latches onto.

Your explanation of your findings have given me the answer. Although the source driving the power-amp (yes, the power amp will be Proprius) might have a different level of hiss, putting the attenuation at the input instead of the output removes the need for output attenuation!

The headphone jack has separate contacts which detect when the plug is plugged in, and they can be used to switch a relay which places an attenuator at the power amp input, effectively doing the same as turning the pots down on the Proprius.

Solution!
Wink
That none should be able to park up and enjoy the view without a smartphone and the knowledge in how to use apps
Back to Top
miT View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 Jan 2009
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 890
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote miT Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Jul 2015 at 11:31am
Interesting... So I wouldn't need to get a speaker taps cable for my headphones with the new amp to get 4w/channel then Graham? Even better!

Not that output has been decided on yet of course...

Edited by miT - 15 Jul 2015 at 11:31am
Back to Top
morris_minor View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2012
Location: Surrey
Status: Offline
Points: 6197
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote morris_minor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Jul 2015 at 4:40pm
Right now I can't be the only one wondering how the Solo ULDE stacks up against the suitably attenuated Proprius . . . can I? Ermm
Bob

Majestic DAC/pre-amp
Accession MC/Enigma, Accession MM, Reflex M, Elevator EXP, Era Gold V
Solo ULDE, Novo, Lautus USB and digital, Libran balanced, CuSat50
2 x Proprius + Spatia/Spatia Links
Back to Top
miT View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 Jan 2009
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 890
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote miT Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Jul 2015 at 4:41pm
Originally posted by morris_minor morris_minor wrote:

Right now I can't be the only one wondering how the Solo ULDE stacks up against the suitably attenuated Proprius . . . can I? Ermm
I believe the answer is not quite as good...
Back to Top
Drewan77 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 May 2013
Location: Chester,England
Status: Offline
Points: 1544
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Drewan77 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Jul 2015 at 5:30pm
Originally posted by miT miT wrote:

Originally posted by morris_minor morris_minor wrote:

Right now I can't be the only one wondering how the Solo ULDE stacks up against the suitably attenuated Proprius . . . can I? Ermm
I believe the answer is not quite as good...
It's probably like asking how a Madras stacks up against a Jalfrezi... different tastes, both equally good!
Older than I once was, younger than I'll be
.............................
Andrew
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.