New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - External DAC: connections
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Welcome to the Graham Slee Audio Products Owners Forum

 

Open to all owners plus those contemplating the purchase of a Graham Slee HiFi System Components audio product and wishing to use this forum's loaner program: join here (Rules on posting can be found here)

This website along with trade marks Graham Slee and HiFi System Components are owned by Cadman Enterprises Ltd


External DAC: connections

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Lucabeer View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Location: Torino, Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lucabeer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: External DAC: connections
    Posted: 28 Jan 2009 at 8:16am
I have already posted this to the Head-Fi forum, but I think that some useful advice might also come from here...

I have just ordered a SuperPro 707 DAC USB, because the idea of feeding the Solo with the output of a crappy motherboard integrated sound card was a big no-no.

I see that this nice little DAC can also be connected to the PC with S/P DIF, in addition to USB.

My integrated sound board (Asus motherboard) is able to output a S/P DIF signal at 48 or 96 Khz, so I was wondering whether the best solution is connecting the DAC to a free USB port or using this S/P DIF connection.

I know that integrated sound boards are crappy as far as it concerns audio quality, but am I correct in thinking that if I use the S/P DIF output to feed the external DAC then it won't matter because the motherboard will actually only feed a pristine bitstream to the DAC (which will do a much better conversion) without altering it?

What worries me a bit is why 48 Khz rather than 44.1... Since ordinary FLAC/Wave/320Kbps MP3s are 44.1 Khz, is there a risk of a badly made upsampling to the signal sent to the S/P DIF? Not that upsampling (if made in the digital domain) is necessarily a bad thing (actually it might make filtering easier for the DAC), but the trick is HOW that upsampling is done..

Thanks for the advice!

Edited by Lucabeer - 28 Jan 2009 at 8:19am
Back to Top
Lucabeer View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Location: Torino, Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lucabeer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jan 2009 at 6:06pm
Well, the DAC arrived today so I can answer myself...

USB seems better, and it proves that the 48Khz upsampling was not exactly a good idea.

For those who might be interested, this very little DAC seems to perform very nicely: dynamics and fullness of the sound (plus of course the signal to noise ratio) are largely improved compared to the integrated soundboard analog output. I am listening to Nick Cave's "Nocturama", and the voice comes out clean and rich, the drumming and the piano have more depth, and the guitar sound crystal clear.

A little cheap DAC that seems to be worth more than it costs!
Back to Top
mrarroyo View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Location: Miami Beach, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 1401
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mrarroyo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jan 2009 at 4:51am
Glad to see you are enjoing your new SuperPro 707 DAC. I have read about it but I honestly have my DAC needs met already so I did not purchase one. Good luck.
Miguel
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.