Welcome to the Graham Slee Audio Products Owners Forum ![]() Open to all owners plus those contemplating the purchase of a Graham Slee HiFi System Components audio product and wishing to use this forum's loaner program: join here (Rules on posting can be found here) This website along with trade marks Graham Slee and HiFi System Components are owned by Cadman Enterprises Ltd |
Reflex C early and confused observations |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 7> |
| Author | |
IvanM
Regular
Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Location: Sheffield UK Status: Offline Points: 87 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Reflex C early and confused observationsPosted: 02 Feb 2010 at 11:22pm |
|
After many years as a committed MC addict, a year or so ago I finally gave it up, not least because of what I learned/heard/read through this website. However, my resolve is now being tested. A few days ago John C (the pusher) mentioned that there was now a MC version of the Reflex. Although I had kicked the habit, I still had a little something in my stash – namely an old but hardly used Ortofon MC30 Supreme (reasonably good gear in its day). So I had the gear and the chance of trying what was likely to be a very good pipe: surely one last smoke wouldn’t hurt? WOW! It’s all coming back: altered perception, familiar things sounding different, warmth, delicacy and secrets revealed, oh joy. DAMN! So is the confusion, the anxiety and paranoia.
So what is going on here? For a start the Reflex C has only been powered up for just over a week and its already starting to blossom, painting surprisingly large scale audio pictures around the place (unlike my Solo headphone amp which took about 6 weeks to reach its best - I’ll write that up elsewhere). Also, the MC30/Reflex C combo is, against my expectation, at least as quiet as my usual Reflex M/Music Maker 3 combo. Speaking of quieter, where as all the surface noise gone? A whole biscuit tin of grit and several pistol shots have been removed from my records. I hadn’t expected any of those things. And as I sit here listening to The Shins (ah melodic rock – the curse of middle age!), I can’t help but be impressed as to just how melodic it is. Not as spectacular or dynamic as the Reflex M/MM3 but sooooo melodic. Before the Shins I played some Madness. Compared to my Reflex M/MM3 setup, it was as if a different band, specifically a Jazz band, had been told to play the songs as near as they could to the original. And they did a great job too but being Jazzers, they couldn’t help giving emphasis to small motifs, brushed cymbals and some previously unnoticed nuances of rhythm and tempo. Also, their idea of piano was less strident and more tinkely plinkely (I believe that is the correct technical term) than the original. So drums don’t have as much wallop and percussion and strings don’t have as much texture but they are coming from a quieter a place and with a little more syncopation and I am surprised at just how familiar and beguiling that is. At present, there isn’t much point to this post (and in fairness that isn't likely to change in the future). It can’t be a review of the Reflex C as despite it giving me some glimpses of depth and scale that I hadn’t expected it isn’t, by GSP standards, even warmed up yet. And the comparison between the two cartridges is probably as relevant as comparing a colander to a wildebeest. The trade off’s are so diverse that I am already doubting my own judgement and objectiveness. To pick up my original analogy though, I think I may be having a flash back and although it isn’t all good, part of me is already wondering if I should ever have kicked the habit. (edit: 03Feb2010 - to remove apparent whole text link to your "D drive") Edited by Graham Slee - 03 Feb 2010 at 2:54am |
|
|
I'd like to agree with you but then we'd both be wrong.
|
|
![]() |
|
tg [RIP]
Moderator Group
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 Location: Sydney Status: Offline Points: 1866 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Feb 2010 at 5:51am |
|
Oh dear, this is indeed troubling news Ivan - if the recent gushing by another member over his new Fanfare is anything to go by, this will only get worse with the passing of time. Next thing we hear and you will be writing to that fellow in SA and ordering one of his handmade wood bodied cartridges or souping up the Technics with a Jelco (or an SME) arm and fitting a nice ebony bodied DL-103 from Germany on a heavy headshell. A worrisome business indeed. |
|
![]() |
|
IvanM
Regular
Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Location: Sheffield UK Status: Offline Points: 87 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Feb 2010 at 12:44am |
|
Second best is best. Further observations, comparisons and questions.
On good recordings that are perfectly pressed onto decent vinyl and that I haven't scratched, the MM3 sets the sonic bar very, very high – it can (almost) literally blow you away. The trouble is that description probably fits for about 15% of my record collection, actually that is being optimistic. And the MM3 will punish my bad records with as much vigour as it will bless my good ones. The MC30 doesn’t achieve the sonic fireworks that the MM3 does on any of the records you feed it: what it does do though, is play pretty much every record somewhere around 80-90% as well detail and presence wise and about 60-70% as impressively, dynamics wise (the MM3/isolator blathers anything else I’ve ever had for dynamics). That may sound like a big shortfall and a recipe for constant disappointment but the levelling out effect and the less intrusive nature of surface noise actually means that I am enjoying more of my records. Rather than hunting out records that sound great, I am just playing what I fancy and enjoying the music. I am still surprised as to just how different the nature of these two setups is. I would have expected the MM3/Isolator to be the most enjoyable but it isn’t: with the right record it is undoubtedly the most impressive and thrilling but it seems to me that the ability to do dynamics to 120% may be a double edged sword. Or perhaps the heavier body and higher tracking weight of MC30 just works better with the Orb/Encounter – it is certainly a lot less fussy setting up and tuning in. Alternatively (and please forgive me for talking about the carts rather than the Reflex thus far), it could be that the Reflex C deals with noise in a way that makes it easier on the ear. It certainly seems to work very well and is doing some lovely stuff with the MC30. Sounds may not leap out and hit you but they have a shimmer that is very appealing and seem to just hang in the air for a long time. In fact, I think the Reflex C may be punching above its weight but while I remain fazed by the differences between the two setups, I can’t really say what’s what, with much confidence. So I have a few questions which people may wish to pass an opinion on: Is the MC Reflex better than the MM Reflex? Is the extra dynamic range of the MM3/Isolator also the cause of the extra noise? If I removed the Isolator would the dynamics drop off as much as the noise? If I stick the Isolator to the MC30 would I get extra dynamics or extra dynamics + extra noise? Does anyone have a view on the MC30Supreme? Has anyone else encountered high levels of surface noise with the MM3/Isolator? (I also find it slightly more essy on some records than the MC30). In the mean time I will compare Reflex with the MC input on my Kairn preamp and hopefully make some valid observations. Edited by IvanM - 10 Feb 2010 at 12:51am |
|
|
I'd like to agree with you but then we'd both be wrong.
|
|
![]() |
|
Cyreg
Moderator Group
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 316 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Feb 2010 at 4:44pm |
|
Ivan, I presume you do adjust the arm-height about right/as required, when you change the TT/arm/cart setup, otherwise..........? IMO MC's always do produce less surface-noise because of their physical construction?
|
|
|
TecnoDec/RB250/MP110>GramAmp2C/PSU1; Cyrus CD8SE; > Exposure 3010S2D INT > Harbeth C7ES-3 '35th Anniversary'
cabling: IC 2x DNM V3; LScable Exposure DMF-two; Furu TP60 + MWaY and BlackCable pc's |
|
![]() |
|
IvanM
Regular
Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Location: Sheffield UK Status: Offline Points: 87 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Feb 2010 at 5:17pm |
|
Hello Cyreg
Yes, I adjust all aspects of the setup exactly to manufacturers spec, then fine tune the VTA by ear (for sweetest treble) but that is no more than a half turn either way on the Encounters VTA wheel.
I track the MM3 at a shade under 1.6 gm which is a tad over the recommended (1.5) but reduces the essynes and the MC30 bang on 2.0 gm, which is the recommended setting.
|
|
|
I'd like to agree with you but then we'd both be wrong.
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Feb 2010 at 6:19pm |
|
That damn nirvana...............
............................always just out of reach
Hi Ivan, how are you?
Adrian.
|
|
![]() |
|
IvanM
Regular
Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Location: Sheffield UK Status: Offline Points: 87 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Feb 2010 at 9:39pm |
|
Hello Adrian
I'm good ta, enjoying the music again after a bit of a break. Hope you are in good order too. Haven't been playing Nirvana but now you mention it I'll give Nevermind a spin. Not out of reach - just in the cupboard next to No Doubt's Tragic Kingdom :-) |
|
|
I'd like to agree with you but then we'd both be wrong.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123 7> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |