Copyright © 1998
Cadman Enterprises Ltd
Welcome to the Graham Slee Audio Products Owners Forum Open to all owners plus those contemplating the purchase of a Graham Slee HiFi System Components audio product and wishing to use this forum's loaner program: join here (Rules on posting can be found here) This website along with trade marks Graham Slee and HiFi System Components are owned by Cadman Enterprises Ltd |
Sennheiser HD 800 S |
Post Reply | Page 123 5> |
Author | |
Benja
Senior Member Joined: 26 Mar 2015 Location: The Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 130 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 10 Jan 2016 at 2:02pm |
I thought i make a Topic about the new Sennheiser HD 800 S headphone. It does not replace the original HD 800 but it is a complentment.
|
|
Steve7
New Member Joined: 16 Dec 2015 Location: E Mids Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
All I will add is that it's the one can I think I should hear, as a long time Grado user. Seems to be often cited as a bit of a reference level item, and a very exact sounding option.
There are a lot of 800 used now, as the aficionados upgrade to the new S. Edited by Steve7 - 10 Jan 2016 at 4:22pm |
|
Ash
Senior Member Joined: 18 Mar 2013 Location: Dorset Status: Offline Points: 4334 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'm not going to lie, if the phase response of the HD800 were to be as musically engaging as the HD540II, it would wipe the floor with the HD540II in all areas except the larger physical weight/size. But to my ears, there was something withdrawn about its neutral transparent sound that just didn't provide an engaging rhythm and involvement in the same way that the HD540II model could do for me. I'm not intensely biased towards the HD540II; I really like it but if I truly believed that the HD800 did everything better, I'd just come straight out and say it. HD800 just didn't have the groove and rhythm for me, so I can understand why Graham didn't recommend them for vinyl. After all, isn't one of the highlights of well-mastered vinyl a fantastic phase fidelity?? I'm guessing that they probably haven't addressed this issue with the S version so I'm not sure whether it'll be an improvement...
K1000 wipes the floor with both of these models and well set up well-engineered speaker drivers are able to wipe the floor with the K1000, if every aspect of reproduction is carefully optimised.
Edited by Ash - 10 Jan 2016 at 8:46pm |
|
Benja
Senior Member Joined: 26 Mar 2015 Location: The Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 130 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I like the black colour better on the 800 S than the silver colour on the original atleast.
|
|
RichW
Senior Member Joined: 21 Jan 2013 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 1471 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Reports suggest the new 'S' HD800 has a smoother & more refined treble with an
extended bass over the original. The bright treble is certainly a weak point of the '800 - the 540 II is better here IMO. Will be interesting to hear the refined version. |
|
Majestic/Enigma, Accession MM & MC.
|
|
ROMPerformance
Regular Joined: 24 Nov 2015 Location: Northampton Status: Offline Points: 75 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'd love to try out the HD 800 S and compare them against my HD 800. Is the difference going to be significant or is it just tiny subtleties i wonder? More refined means what?
Whilst i wish my cans sounded a bit more like my speakers for warmth and base, and that's just a personal preference, i think they cope really well with everything else. Always crystal clear, no sibilance or odd timbres that shouldn't be there, lovely imaging, super detailed, and I can't fault them. While I've not heard the 540II's, and i've no doubt they are every bit as good as you say, when comparing them are you going by out and out performance, general differences in sound/tonality, or is it purely a personal taste/preference overall thing. I presume we all hear stuff differently so one man's idea of awesome sound can be very different to another's and therefore different listeners will come up with different conclusions. It's probably fair to say there will be owners/reviewers etc, that will say the opposite. I suppose the only way to find out is to audition said cans back to back and make a personal judgement, that includes the 540II's. Anybody got a set of HD 800S i can audition?
|
|
Francis :0)
Majestic DAC, Proprii, Solo ULDE, Voyager, Libran, Lautus, Spatia,, Cyrus CD XT SE2, Cyrus PSX-R, Sennheiser HD 800 and 540 Ref2, Harbeth SHL5 |
|
Ash
Senior Member Joined: 18 Mar 2013 Location: Dorset Status: Offline Points: 4334 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
HD540II is more musical and physically lighter than HD800 but HD800 has improved resolution across the frequencies, improved bass weight and larger stereo image (you can tell that you're listening to drivers with a larger radiating area). This is coming from a HD540II fan; just saying it how it is. 540II is more comfortable IMO but both still retain headphone character in how they present the music. They don't sound like speakers but they do sound spatial.
|
|
Post Reply | Page 123 5> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |