Copyright © 1998
Cadman Enterprises Ltd
Welcome to the Graham Slee Audio Products Owners Forum Open to all owners plus those contemplating the purchase of a Graham Slee HiFi System Components audio product and wishing to use this forum's loaner program: join here (Rules on posting can be found here) This website along with trade marks Graham Slee and HiFi System Components are owned by Cadman Enterprises Ltd |
Analysing hi-res files |
Post Reply | Page 123 6> |
Author | |
morris_minor
Moderator Group Joined: 27 Mar 2012 Location: Surrey Status: Offline Points: 6017 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 01 Jun 2013 at 12:21pm |
A short while ago I stumbled on this interesting article.
I'd long wondered if the high resolution files I'd downloaded (from sites like HDTracks) were really all they claimed. With the info from the article I downloaded the free Sonic Visualiser software (PC and Mac) and looked at two Spyro Gyra files. The first (orange plot, below) was a known quantity since it was a rip I'd made myself of a LP at 96/24. The second files (purple plot) is from an HDTracks download (at 96/24). Unfortunately the horizontal axis in the software isn't labeled, but extends from 0 to half the sample rate. So for these two files it's 0 to 48Khz. Unless I'm reading it all wrong (quite possible!) the HDTracks file has been upsampled to 96kHz because of the steep drop in the plot at around 20kHz, whereas my rip shows no such drop - rather a gentle decline in treble energy. [If I really am getting all this wrong, please can someone tell me . . ]. Of course, knowing what I now know about how digital recording actually works (thank you Graham!!) I won't be bothering any more with anything over redbook standards for playback. I'm sure I'll find other examples of upsampled files if I look, but I may not bother and just listen to the music instead . . . Maybe others here will find this free analysis program useful? |
|
Bob
Majestic DAC/pre-amp Accession MC/Enigma, Accession MM, Reflex M, Elevator EXP, Era Gold V Solo ULDE, Novo, Lautus USB and digital, Libran balanced, CuSat50 2 x Proprius + Spatia/Spatia Links |
|
Fatmangolf
Moderator Group Joined: 23 Dec 2009 Location: Middlesbrough Status: Offline Points: 8998 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks Bob, that's a good software link and I'm going to have a look at it later.
Hifi News highlighted this disturbing issue a couple of years ago and their download reviews include an energy spectrum analysis like yours to show which recordings really are 88k2, 96k, 192kHz. For example a 88k2 recording rather than an upsampled 44k1 that is labelled as 88k2, which your purple graph may be. Simply put - why would we pay extra for a download company to upsample a CD when most of us already own DAC's that will do the same? |
|
Jon
Open mind and ears whilst owning GSP Genera, Accession M, Accession MC, Elevator EXP, Solo ULDE, Proprius amps, Cusat50 cables, Lautus digital cable, Spatia cables and links, and a Majestic DAC. |
|
Ash
Senior Member Joined: 18 Mar 2013 Location: Dorset Status: Offline Points: 4334 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Even more simply put - Why would we bother to buy any digital file "higher" than CD quality? It has no increased resolution compared to the CD. Graham and that Xiph guy have already cleared this up for us. No current digital releases address the dB stepping deficit so it seems that unless this happens, vinyl will always be King.
|
|
We do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
|
|
marshmid
Senior Member Joined: 10 Feb 2013 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 136 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi Bob,
That is a great piece of software. I have managed to reproduce your lower graph using a free download of an 88kHz sampled file. I see a gradual decline without any steep breaks. However, the axes on the lower graph are unlabelled. Do you know what they are? Where did you see/deduce that the step you observe is at 20kHz? I would like to try this on a number of purchased 'HD' tracks and free downloads - but I would like to know what I'm looking at! Best regards Marsh |
|
morris_minor
Moderator Group Joined: 27 Mar 2012 Location: Surrey Status: Offline Points: 6017 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi Marsh, Did you mean my "upper graph" - the orange one - this is pukka 96/24 file . . . It's a shame the software doesn't label the axes. From that web page I linked to it seems that the horizontal scale goes from 0 to half the sample rate. So for 96kHz files it's 0 to 48KHz. Since the scale is a log scale, halfway along the scale would equate (for a 96kHz file) to 24 kHz. The sharp drop in my purple graph comes just before halfway along, so would equate to around 20-22kHz which is the limit for redbook files. Jon mentioned Hi-Fi News doing these plots, and it was these that first got me interested in trying to find out what my download were - so finding this little program was really useful.
|
|
Bob
Majestic DAC/pre-amp Accession MC/Enigma, Accession MM, Reflex M, Elevator EXP, Era Gold V Solo ULDE, Novo, Lautus USB and digital, Libran balanced, CuSat50 2 x Proprius + Spatia/Spatia Links |
|
Fatmangolf
Moderator Group Joined: 23 Dec 2009 Location: Middlesbrough Status: Offline Points: 8998 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi Bob, you've got me thinking and I wanted to explain why I do bother with HD recordings.
I think the sample rate is really important as it determines the highest frequencies the digital recording will reproduce and what is done to those sounds. Real sounds like voices and instruments, acoustics and noise do go beyond our hearing range. A recording has capture these or reject them without adding artifacts within the sounds that are recorded. After a quarter of a century there's a wealth of literature, evidence and opinion on CD's and the 44.1 kHz sample rate. Its 22,050 Hz "ceiling" on the sounds on CD's means low pass filters are needed to remove sounds above this. This will attenuate and alter the phase of the signals in the passband of the filter. In other words the sound that gets through will be altered a bit before it is recorded. That may be 16-22 kHz, and there's definitely musical content up there! The choice of filter type would make a difference to the ADC process and was one of the settings included in the HDCD standard. If you have a CD player or DAC that lets you choose between different filters e.g. an Audiolab M-DAC, you are exploring a similar effect on playback. Now imagine the cut off filter in the recording at 88k2Hz. It is at 44.1 kHz, or twice the CD level. That would mean that the sounds from 16kHz - 22kHz aren't in the filter pass band anymore. Potentially it is another octave of ultrasonic sound. That's why I think a good recording at a high sample rate like 88k2, 96k or 192kHz would be better than the CD equivalent. |
|
Jon
Open mind and ears whilst owning GSP Genera, Accession M, Accession MC, Elevator EXP, Solo ULDE, Proprius amps, Cusat50 cables, Lautus digital cable, Spatia cables and links, and a Majestic DAC. |
|
morris_minor
Moderator Group Joined: 27 Mar 2012 Location: Surrey Status: Offline Points: 6017 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I do agree with you Jon, about higher frequencies. Harmonics, if not fundamentals, exist way above the audible threshold. It's the process how we actually perceive them that seems a sticking point.
Seems to me we're safer sticking to vinyl!
|
|
Bob
Majestic DAC/pre-amp Accession MC/Enigma, Accession MM, Reflex M, Elevator EXP, Era Gold V Solo ULDE, Novo, Lautus USB and digital, Libran balanced, CuSat50 2 x Proprius + Spatia/Spatia Links |
|
Post Reply | Page 123 6> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |