New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - AKG K-702
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Join our friendly forum here and subscribe to our newsletters here

A rule of fairness:
When other manufacturers websites allow people to recommend our products instead of their own then people can do the same here, but please not before! Such posts will be deleted.
See terms and conditions here...


AKG K-702

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Chris Firth View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group


Joined: 16 May 2013
Location: Rossendale, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 688
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Chris Firth Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: AKG K-702
    Posted: 28 Oct 2016 at 7:41pm
My latest headphones are AKG K-702s, and I'm reet gruntled wi'em (Northern speak for properly pleased with them).
They've been thrashed with signal going through them for a week, and they've lost their initial slightly uptight quality, to blossom into a remarkably lucid and engaging transducer.

With them I get what I liked about the Sennheiser HD-650, but with a wonderfully open top end.
The HD-650 has a wonderful midband, but fell down for me with the treble performance - they're just too cuddly and rolled off in my opinion.
The K-702s just sing out clearly and accurately, and high harmonics from acoustic guitars are beautifully rendered (my reference point is a Martin DCPA5, which sees regular sofa action).

Something I'd like to dispel is the myth that the AKG K-702s don't do bass - they do, but you've got to work them hard and long to get them to loosen up, and once they loosen up they have you hooked.
From out of the box new they don't sound great, but put a good few hours on them with some taxing material.

They are a better headphone than the Superlux (they should be too, at five times the price), with greater control and precision. This is not to denigrate the Superlux - they are the headphone bargain, and they'll show many a headphone a clean set of heels.
It's just the AKG K-702 are more measured, and ultimately a better conduit for the music.

The K-702s also qualify for just about the most comfortable set of cans I have ever worn.

I am a very happy camper Big smile






Back to Top
Ash View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2013
Location: Dorset
Status: Offline
Points: 2751
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ash Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Oct 2016 at 10:10am
I've never used this headphone but looking at its chamber/driver qualities, I can understand why Graham once said they (the K701, which is the same design with a different colour scheme and no detachable cable) almost matched the sound of the HD800 at times (in terms of stereo imaging anyway). The K-702 has quite a large driver diameter compared to the vintage Senns from my old thread so the transducer moves more air.

Edited by Ash - 30 Oct 2016 at 7:08pm
Back to Top
Fatmangolf View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2009
Location: Middlesbrough
Status: Offline
Points: 5019
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Fatmangolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Oct 2016 at 9:46pm
Thanks Ash and Chris, the loosening up is clearly very good advice to get the most from the design.


Edited by Fatmangolf - 29 Oct 2016 at 9:47pm
Jon

Open mind and ears, whilst owning GSP Genera, Accession, Elevator EXP, Solo ULDE, Proprius amps, Cusat50 cables, Lautus digital cable, Spatia cables and links, and a Majestic DAC.
Back to Top
Graham Slee View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Pushing the boundaries

Joined: 11 Jan 2008
Location: South Yorkshire
Status: Offline
Points: 8085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Graham Slee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Oct 2016 at 7:14am
Forum graft (choose your own definition!) gave the K701 cult status.

The forums also killed the HD250II.

Both had a poor initial sound which lasted weeks and probably resulted in much densistry. Wink

The K701 (IMO) vastly improved given time and a sound-thrashing, but still grains of high frequency distortion remain. I can only assume its creator developed them with a K1000 (specialised) 10 watt power amp.

Over the years I have driven headphones with numerous amplifier configurations, including the output of power amplifier voltage amplifiers, direct from power amplifiers meant for speakers, as well as my own headphone amps.

The earlier Sennheiser HD450 at 600 Ohms was equally happy being driven from a power amp direct, or via a IEC61938 120 ohms series resistance. So was the latter HD250II.

But the K701 was far more fussy. Near to zero Ohms drive suited it best making it unsuitable for just about any headphone jack.

Very much like the Grado's, developed with their own amplifier: these need the output impedance of the op-amp it used.

Why therefore would vast numbers of headphone fans want to buy (and virally promote) a headphone which required a specialised amp to drive it?

I finally nailed it with the ULDE, along with the Grado's.

I have never heard the K702. I trust the trace of HF distortion has been cured.
Not simple enough for Google-Bot to understand...
Back to Top
Ash View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2013
Location: Dorset
Status: Offline
Points: 2751
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ash Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Oct 2016 at 7:29pm
Graham, I think the K702 is exactly the same design as the K701, except the 702 is a different colour and has a detachable cable.

I have driven Senn HD540II, HD560II and HD800 each directly from Proprius power amps too. Obviously I set the Proprius dials low to suit the headphone impedance and sensitivity so that no hiss could be heard through them. If I recall correctly, HD540II and HD560II were used with Proprius dials at about 9 or 10 o'clock whereas HD800 was driven at 8 or 9 o'clock due to its higher sensitivity and increased ability to resolve low level hiss/noise. The HD250II would have been used at the same dial position as 540/560, as all three models have very similar characteristics and needs. I can use the K1000 at any dial position before 3 o'clock (I typically just set at 12 for ease). Beyond 3 o'clock, the impedance characteristics must be sub-optimal as low level hiss/noise can be heard through the K1000.

In my opinion, all of these headphones sounded just as good through the Proprius as they did through the Solo UL or ULDE. The headphone amp didn't seem to give these particular devices anything additional to what the power amps gave them, to my ears. No improvement could be heard from Solo. Maybe I'm just deaf but I think it's because the Proprius are so damn good that they can be used as either a high impedance or low sensitivity headphone amp and as a speaker amp, depending on the load characteristics of course.
Back to Top
miT View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 Jan 2009
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 650
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote miT Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Oct 2016 at 7:29pm
I had the K701s for a long time at the start of my head-fi career and was pretty chuffed with them too, although I only ever used them through the Novo and then Solo II SRG + PSU1. It was recommended on a website with burn in times to let them go for 500hrs and I did this religiously from new. I also followed Graham's advice about keeping them physically warm during this period... I used them happily until I upgraded last year with a set of HD540IIs from Ash, but I shall stay on topic. Wink
In regards to the low frequencies, they are a tad "light" when compared to how everything else we are used to overblows it. I always found that the low-end was clearly audible for discerning ears and this allowed you to focus on the texture of the bass, something they reproduced very well.
The K702s are supposed to be very similar (if not the same from mixed reports) but if you like the sound they produce, they'll certainly give you an engaging listen. Thumbs Up
Contrary to what Graham said, I always found they were welcomed with mostly hatred on Head-Fi! But that reinforced their qualities to me as what do that lot know?? LOL
Back to Top
Ash View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2013
Location: Dorset
Status: Offline
Points: 2751
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ash Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Oct 2016 at 7:43pm
It would be interesting to compare HD540II, K702 and HD800 side-by-side, to listen whether the perceived sound of the audio presentation definitely gets bigger as the driver diameter (therefore radiating area) is increased. I believe HD540II has a 36mm driver, K702 has 45mm driver and HD800 has 56mm driver. Although I'm not willing to spend any more money on headphones to find out. Don't want to have to report to HA (Headphones Anonymous) for falling off the wagon...
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.047 seconds.